Network system of distribution



June 21, 1938. J. s. PARSONS ET AL NETWORK SYSTEM OF DISTRIBUTION Original Filed May 19, 1934 2 Sheets-Sheet 1 INVENTORS WITNESSES:

.fahn 5 l arams and June 1933- Y J. 5. PARSONS ET AL 2,121,608

NETWORK SYSTEM OF DISTRIBUTION Original Filed May 19, 1934 2 Sheets-Sheet 2 Iii lg:

WITNESSES: INVENT J'0/7/76T @4100: ma

Geo rr/ a0.

ATT EY Patented June 21, 1938 UNITED STATES PATENT OFFICE NETWORK SYSTEM OF DISTRIBUTION John S. Parsons, Swissvale, and George 0. Harrison, Wilkinsburg, Pa., assignors to Westinghouse Electric & Manufacturing Company, East Pittsburgh, Pa... a corporation of Pennsylvania 6 Claims.

The present application is a division of our copending application, Serial No. 726,576, filed May 19, 1934, now U. S. Patent No. 2,075,132, granted March 30, 1937, assigned to Westinghouse Electric 8: Manufacturing Company. In our parent patent, mentioned above, there is disclosed a simplified network distribution system having the usual alternating-current distribution network supplied by means of a plurality of feeders through banks of step-down transformers, and having network circuit breakers located at the usual positions for individually controlling the power flow through the various banks of transformers. However, in place of the usual induction relay equipment for the network protectors, our parent patent discloses a novel form of simplified control equipment and a novel method of operating the network to supply the network load and clear feeder faults.

In accordance with the principle of our prior patent, the phasing apparatus is separated from the reclosing apparatus of the individual network protectors, and is applied to the feeder in such a manner as to artificially create an abnormal condition of the feeder in the event of crossed phase connections. As explained in the patent, the artificial abnormal condition may be a loadback condition, a ground, phase-to-phase fault, or any other suitable electrical condition, dependent upon the type of apparatus employed, which will cause the network protectors to open or remain open as long as the crossed phase condition exists. In this way the necessity for individual phasing apparatus for the protectors is elimihated. and at the same time, protection is secured against crossed phases, without the necessity of an elaborate phase checking operation after every feeder fault.

The above-mentioned parent application also discloses a novel form of network protector control equipment in, which separate relays are provided for detecting a transposed phase condition of any two feeder conductors and for detecting a rotation of all three feeder conductors through a phase angle of 120 or 240. The present application relates to such control equipment in its application to alternating-current networks generally, and in its application to the specific form of network system disclosed and claimed in our above-mentioned prior patent. We do not claim herein, however, the use of such control equipment in its specific application to the forms of network apparatus having individual self-contained opening and closing equipment, as this (C1. TIL-9'1) tion of all three feeder conductors through a phase angle of 120 or 240.

A further object of our invention is to provide a novel phasing device for polyphase alternatingcurrent networks operating upon the phase sequence principle.

Other objects of our invention will become evident from the following detailed description taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawing, in which:

Figure 1 is a diagrammatic view, in single-line form, of a polyphase network system embodying our invention;

Fig. 2 is a diagrammatic view of a simplified form of network protector to be used in the practice of our invention;

Fig. 3 is a diagrammatic view of a preferred form of control apparatus for the grounding switches used in the practice of our invention;

Figs. 4 and 5 are diagrammatic views of modifications of the protector shown in Fig. 2;

Fig. 6 is a diagrammatic view of a modification of the control apparatus shown in Fig. 3; and

Fig. i is a diagrammatic view of a modified form of relay apparatus which we may use in the protector of Fig. 5.

Referring to Fig. 1 in detail, a polyphase grounded-neutral medium voltage source 1, which may be a generating station or substation bus, is connected by means of a feeder circuit breaker 2 to a feeder 3. The feeder circuit breaker 2 is equipped with the usual control apparatus for causing it to open in the event of a fault on the feeder 3. This control apparatus may include reclosing and lockout apparatus for effecting one or more reclosures and for locking the feeder breaker 2 in open position in the event of a permanent fault. As such apparatus is well known in the art and forms no part of the present invention, it has not been illustrated in the drawing. It will be assumed, however, that regardless of the form of control apparatus provided for In of the feeder breaker.

A plurality of banks of transformers 4 are conm cted to the feeder 3, for supplying power to a low-voltage polyphase network I, in accordance with the usual practice. The banks of transformers 4 are preferably connected in delta on the feeder or high-voltage side and in star, with neutral grounded on the network side, but may be connected in other ways familiar to those skilled in the art. It is essential only, in the illustrated form of the invention, that the high voltage windings of the transformer banks 4 be ungrounded. A plurality of network protectors i are interposed between the transformer banks 4 and the network I in the usual manner, and the network I is supplied from the source I by means of other feeders, as indicated fragmentarily at I.

In accordance with our invention, in addition to the network protectors 0, a normally open switch 0 is connected to one conductor of the feeder 3 adjacent the end of each major division of the feeder. The switches I are biased to closed position but are normally held open by electromagnetically controlled latches, as will be hereinafter described in connection with Fig. 3. The switches I are provided for artificially creating an abnormal condition of the feeder I in the event of crossed phases, as mentioned above, and for this purpose are preferably arranged to ground the conductor of the feeder I which is grounded by the back contact'members 2a of the feeder breaker 2 when the latter is open. It will be assumed that the a-phase conductor of the feeder 3 is arranged to be grounded by either of the switches l or the back contacts 2a. A-resistor 0 may be included in series with each switch 8 to limit the feeder current which will flow upon operation of one of the latter, if desired, but in the majority of applications, no such impedance would be necessary or desirable.

Referring to Fig. 2, which shows a network protector I as associated with a delta-star transformer bank 4, the network protector 6 consists of a network circuit breaker ill, a set of back-up fuses Illa and suitable control apparatus for the network circuit breaker ill. The latter may be of various forms but is shown as an electrostatic relay ll connected by means of a capacitor I! to a high voltage terminal of the transformer bank 4.

The electrostatic relay II is provided with a movable contact member Ila, a front contact member llb and a back contact member He. This relay is so designed that the movable contact member He engages the front contact member llb in response to a voltage condition of approximately 90% of the normal line-to-ground voltage of the feeder I and engages the back contact member He in response to an undervoltage condition of approximately 30% normal line-to-ground voltage.

The front contact member lib is connected in circuit with a timing relay l3, preferably of the synchronous type commonly used in the art, for controlling the closure of the network circuit breaker ll when feeder voltage conditions are approximately normal. The timing relay is is provided for preventing closure of the network circuit breaker I! for a sufficient time interval to permit the operation of either of the grounding switches 8 in the event of crossed feeder phases. This time interval need be only a fraction of a second. However, in order to prevent voltage disturbances on the network 5, we prefer to introduce a time delay sufficient to permit the feeder breaker 2 to lock out in the event of crossed phase connections. For this purpose the timing relay I3 is preferably adjusted to introduce a time delay of the order of to 30 seconds after energization of the feeder 3, before closure of the network circuit breaker l0. It will be assumed that the timing relay l3 closes in 20 seconds and opens substantially instantaneously. The timing relays I! of the protectors 8 at the ends of the major divisions of the feeder 3 (Fig. 1), however, are adjusted to close with a slightly longer time delay, for example,- seconds, in order to permit a phase-checking operation when the protectors are closing on a deenergized network.

With this arrangement, the network circuit breaker l0 trips open in response to a phase-toground under-voltage condition below normal on the a-phase conductor of feeder I, and recloses with a time delay of twenty seconds, when the phase-to-ground voltage of the a-phase conductor of the feeder 3 is approximately normal.

Referring to Fig. 3, one of the normally open switches 8 is shown therein in connection with its control apparatus. The switch 8 is biased to closed position by means of a spring in but is normally held in open position by means of an electromagnetically released latch 8b. A voltage responsive relay l4 and a negative phase sequence voltage relay ii are provided for controlling the closure of the switch 8 in the event of an abnormal relationship o f feeder and network voltages. The voltage responsive relay i4 is connectedacross the main contact members of the nearest network circuit breaker Ill, and is designed to close at a voltage value of approximately 130% normal phase-to-ground voltage of the low voltage network. The purpose of this relay is to trip the switch I to closed position in the event that all three conductors of the feeder have been rotated 120 or 240 in repairing a feeder fault.

The negative phase sequence voltage relay II is connected to a negative phase sequence voltage filter It to be energized in accordance with the negative symmetrical components of the polyphase voltage appearing across the secondary terminals of the transformer bank 4. The filter i6 is preferably of the type disclosed in the U. S. patent of B. E. Lenehan, No. 1,936,797 and comprises an auto-transformer lia having a tap, and a resistor lib and reactor lie having a combined lagging phase angle of The impedance of the resistor llib and reactor llc are so related that the voltage appearing across the resistor I6!) is equal to 40% of the total voltage impressed upon the resistor lib and reactor lie in series and lags the latter voltage by a phase angle of 60". With this arrangement, the voltage impressed upon the negative sequence voltage relay I5 is proportional to the negative symmetrical components of the voltage applied to the terminals of the filter l6, as explained in the above-mentioned Lenehan patent.

The negative phase sequence voltage relay II is designed to close without time delay whenever the negative symmetrical components of polyphase voltage exceed a comparatively small value, such as 25% of the normal positive sequence voltage of the network 5. If any two conductors of the feeder 3 have been transposed in repairing a feeder fault, a negative sequence voltage of considerably higher value than 25% normal positive voltage will be impressed upon the negative phase sequence voltage relay l3, and the latter will close. The relay I! also operates in the'event that any single feeder conductor has been left open in repairing a feeder fault. The case of two conductors of the feeder 3 being open need not be provided for as no short-circuit would occur upon closure of a network protector under these conditions.

Returning to Fig. 1, the operation of the system as a whole may be set forth'as follows: to disconnect the feeder 3 entirely at times of light load, the feeder breaker 2 is opened. Upon opening of the feeder breaker 2, the a-phase conductor of the feeder 3 is grounded through back contact members 2a of the feeder breaker. As the feeder 3 is entirely disconnected from ground except through the contacts 3a, no power current flows, through the latter, and the maximum current flow is that due to unbalanced feeder charging current. However, the voltage to ground of all the feeder conductors is redistributed, as the neutral ground connection of the source I is no longer connected to the feeder 3. The phase-to-ground voltage of all points on the a-phase conductor becomes substantially zero and the phase-to-ground voltages of the two remaining conductors of the feeder 3 increase to approximately 173% of normal as delta voltages are supp ied to the feeder 3 from the network 5.

In response to the under-voltage condition produced on the a-phase conductor of the feeder 3, the electrostatic relays H of all of the network protectors 6 operate to trip open the corresponding protectors. In this way the feeder 3 is entirely disconnected.

If the feeder breaker 2 is reclosed, the neutral ground connection of the source I is again connected to the feeder 3, and the phase-to-ground voltages of each of the conductors of feeder 3 become approximately normal. In response to normal voltage the movable contact member Ha of each electrostatic relay H, (see Fig. 2) engages the front contact member llb to complete a circuit for the corresponding timing relay l3. The network protectors 6 accordingly all reclose after a time delay of twenty seconds.

If a fault occurs on the feeder 3, as at point X, the feeder breaker 2 trips open, and establishes a ground on the a-phase conductor of the feeder 3 through its back contact members 2a. In response to this grounded condition, the network protectors 6 trip open in the manner described above. If the fault is a phase-to-ground fault on the a-phese conductor of feeder 3, the voltage-to-ground of the latter conductor may fall below the 30% value to which the network protectors respond, and some of the protectors may open before the feeder breaker 2 opens. In any event, the network protectors 6 are all opened directly or indirectly in response to the fault to completely disconnect the faulted feeder 3.

If in repairing the feeder fault, any two conductors of the feeder 3 are transposed, all three feeder conductors are rotated 120 or 240, or a conductor of the feeder 3 is left open, one or both of the switches 8 will be tripped to closed posi tion when the feeder breaker 2 is closed. Upon closure of the switch 8, the feeder breaker 2 trips open in response to the artificially established fault, and again establishes a ground through its back contact members 2a. In response to this ground the network protectors 3 are prevented from closing. The feeder conductors at point X may then be transposed until the proper connections are obtained. The closed switch 3 may be manually reset and the feeder 3 restored to operation when the proper connections are established.

If a fault occurs in the high-voltage leads of one of the transformers l, as at point Y, a somewhat different procedure is followed. In this case the single network protector 3, which controls the power flow through the faulted leads, is blocked open. After the fault has been repaired, and the feeder breaker reclosed, the voltages across this protector are measured with a voltmeter. If no phases have been crossed the open protector is restored to operation. As the repairmen must visit the vicinity of the protector to repair the faulted leads, there is no particular inconvenience in blocking open the single protector involved.

If a fault occurs on the network I, the fault is burned off in the usual manner. As the impedance of a network transformer, such as l, is invariably high as compared to the impedance of a feeder, such as feeder 3, the feeder voltage is not greatly reduced in the event of any form of network fault. In the case of the most severe network faults, such as three-phase short circuits close to the transformers, the feeder voltage may fall to a value of the order of 50 to of normal. However, as the electrostatic relays l l trip only on under-voltage conditions below 30% of normal, none of these relays operate and the protectors 6 all remain closed.

Fig. 4 shows an electromagnetic protector control system which may be used in place of the electrostatic arrangement shown in Fig. 2. Referring to Fig. 4, a potential transformer I1 is connected between one conductor of the feeder 3 and ground. The secondary winding of the potential transformer I1 is connected to energize an instantaneous under-voltage relay l3, an instantaneous over-voltage relay l9 and an induction type over-voltage relay 20. The induction relay 20 is adjusted to close at a minimum voltage of approximately normal and to interpose a time delay of approximately 20 seconds when energized at normal voltage. The undervoltage relay I8 is designed to drop out at 9. voltage of approximately 30% normal, and the overvoltage relay I9 is designed to close at a voltage of the order of normal. The operation of this arrangement is similar to that described in connection with Fig. 2, except that the over-voltage relay l9 causes the circuit breaker ill to open in response to grounds on either the b-phase or c-phase conductors of the feeder 3. As the under-voltage relay l8 causes opening of the circuit breaker H! in response to a-phase grounds, it is immaterial in this arrangement to which phase the control apparatus is connected.

Figs. 5 and 6 show the control apparatus for a modified form of our invention in which the protection against open feeder circuits is provided by the network protectors themselves rather than the grounding switches. In this arrangement also, the network protectors respond directly to all phase-to-phase and phase-toground faults independently of the feeder breaker. Referring to Fig. 5, which shows the protector control apparatus, the feeder 3, transformers 4, network circuit breaker l and fuses iiia are arranged as in Fig. 2. Three electromagnetic voltage-responsive relays 2| are connected to a pair of V--V connected potential transformers 22 to be energized in accordance with the delta voltage of feeder I.

The relays 2| are provided for tripping the network circuit breaker III in response to phaseto-phase voltage conditions below a predetermined value, such as 30% normal, and for causing reclosure of the network circuit breaker I0 when the feeder 2 is clear of faults and voltage conditions of the feeder l are approximately normal. For this purpose the relays 2| may be designed to drop out at a voltage of the order of 30% of normal and to reclose at a voltage approaching normal, such as 95% normal. However, rather than flxing both the drop-out and closing voltages of the relays 2| by design, we prefer to provide a separate closing relay 2! energized in accordance with a phase-to-phase secondary voltage of the transformer bank 4.

The closing relay 23 1s designed to close, preferably with time delay, in response to a secondary phase-to-phase voltage of the transformer bank 4 of approximately 95% normal. A ground-detecting relay 24 is provided for causing the network circuit breaker lll to open in response to a ground on any conductor of the feeder 8. The ground-detecting relay 24 is connected to one conductor of the feeder I in series with a suitable impedance 25, shown as a capacitor, and is arranged to trip the network circuit breaker l0 and prevent operation of the closing relay 23 when a ground exists on any phase of the feeder I. For this purpose the ground-detecting relay 24 is designed to close front contact members in response to an over-voltage condition of the order of 125% normal phase-to-ground, and to close back contact members in response to an under-voltage condition of the order of 30% normal phase-to-ground voltage.

With the arrangement shown in Fig. 5, the network circuit breaker is tripped open in response to a ground on any conductor or a short circuit between any conductors of the feeder 3, and is reclosed with time delay when all phaseto-phase voltages of the feeder I are above 60% of normal absolute value, the resultant of two delta voltages of the feeder I exceeds 95% of normal, and one phase-to-ground voltage of the feeder 3 lies between 30% and 125% of normal. Under these conditions the feeder 2 is practically certain to be free of all faults and energized by approximately normal voltage.

Referring to Fig. 6, which shows a preferred control arrangement for a grounding switch 8 to be used with the protector 6 of Fig. 5, three voltage-responsive relays 26, similar to the voltage-responsive relay H of Fig. 3, are connected across the main contacts of the nearest protector 8. The relays 28 are provided for energizing the trip mechanism 8b of the grounding switch (not shown) in the event of crossed feeder phases, and close in response to voltages of approximately 130% in the same manner as the relay l4 of Fig. 3. This arrangement protects against the transposition of any two feeder conductors or the rotation of all three 120 or 240. It is not necessary to operate the grounding switch in response to an open feeder circuit with this arrangement as the protectors of Fig. 5 will not close if any feeder circuit is open.

Fig. 7 shows an alternative electrostatic relay arrangement which may be substituted for the electromagnetic relays of Fig. 5. Referring to Fig. '1, three electrostatic relays 21 are each connected in series with pairs of equal capacitors 28 in a delta connection, tobe energized in accordance with the phase-to-phase voltages of the feeder l. The electrostatic relays 21 are designed to close under the same system conditions is the relays 2| of Fig. 5 and to perform the same functions as the latter. A fourth electrostatic relay 29 is provided for causing the network circuit breaker (not shown) to open in the event of ground faults in the same manner as the ground-detecting relay 24 of Fig. 5. A contactor 30 is provided, in this modification, in order to permit reduction of the number of sets of contact members which would otherwise be required on the electrostatic relay 29. Back auxiliary contact members of the network circuit breaker (not shown) are indicated diagrammatically at 3|. The operation of the arrangement shown in Fig. 7 is substantially the same as that of the protector shown in Fig. 5 and will be readily understood.

In some applications where it is convenient to block open the protectors and check voltages,

the protector shown in Fig. 5, or the modification thereof shown in Fig. '7, may be used without the grounding switch arrangement shown in Fig. 6.

We do not intend that the present invention shall be restricted to the specific structural details, arrangement of parts or circuit connections herein set forth as various modifications thereof may be efl'ected without departing from the spirit and scope of our invention. We desire, therefore, that only such limitations shall be imposed as are indicated in the appended claims.

We claim as our invention:

1. In an alternating-current network system of distribution, a three-phase alternating-current network circuit; supply means therefor including a three-phase alternating-current supply circuit; a network circuit breaker for connecting and disconnecting said circuits, said network circuit breaker having suitable closing means; means responsive to reversed sequence of the phase voltages of said supply circuit for preventing closure of said circuit breaker in the event of an interchange of two phase conductors of said supply means; and means responsive to an excess voltage condition between a phase conductor of said supply circuit and a corresponding phase conductor of said network circuit for preventing closure of said circuit breaker in the event of a transposition of three conductors of said supply means without reversal of sequence.

2. In an alternating-current network system of distribution, a three-phase alternating-current network circuit, supply means therefor including a three-phase alternating-current supply circuit; a network circuit breaker for connecting and disconnecting said circuits, said network circuit breaker having suitable closing means; a negative phase sequence voltage filter connected to said supply circuit for segregating a negative sequence voltage component thereof; means responsive to the negative sequence voltage segregated by said fllter for preventing closure of said circuit breaker in the event of an interchange of two phase conductors of said supply means; and means responsive to an excess voltage condition between a phase conductor of said supply circuit and a corresponding phase conductor of said network circuit for preventing closure of said circuit breaker in the event of a transposition of three conductorsof said supply means without reversal of sequence.

3. In an alternating-current network system of distribution, a three-phase four-conductor alternating-current network circuit; supply means therefor including a three-phase alternatingcurrent supply circuit; a network circuit breaker for connecting and disconnecting said circuits, said network circuit breaker having suitable closing means; a negative phase sequence voltage filter connected to said supply circuit for segregating a negative sequence voltage component thereof; means responsive to the negative sequence voltage segregated by said filter for preventing closure of said circuit breaker in the event of an interchange of two phase conductors of said supply means; and means responsive to an excess voltage condition between a phase conductor of said supply circuit and a corresponding phase conductor of said network circuit for preventing closure of said circuit breaker in the event of a transposition of three conductors of said supply means without reversal of sequence, said excess voltage condition being of the order of of the normal line-to-neutral voltage of said network circuit.

4. In an alternating-current network system of distribution, a three-phase alternating-current network circuit; a three-phase alternating-current feeder circuit; a plurality of transformer means for supplying power from said feeder circuit to said network circuit; a plurality of network circuit breakers for controlling the power fiow through said transformer means, each of said circuit breakers having individual closing means therefor; means individual to said circuit breakers for preventing closure of the corresponding circuit breaker when a predetermined abnormal condition of said feeder circuit exists; and a group phasing device for all of said circuit breakers comprising an element effective, when operated, to establish said predetermined abnormal'condition of said feeder circuit, means responsive to reversed sequence of the phase voltages of said feeder circuit for operating said element, and means responsive to an excess voltage condition between a secondary conductor of one of said transformer means and a corresponding phase conductor of said network circuit for operating said element.

5. In an alternating-current network system of distribution, a three-phase alternating-current network circuit; a three-phase alternating-current feeder circuit; a plurality of transformer means for supplying power from said feeder circuit to said network circuit; a plurality of network circuit breakers for controlling the power fiow through said transformer means, each of said circuit breakers having individual closing means therefor; means individual to said circuit breakers for preventing closure of the corresponding circuit breaker when a predetermined abnormal condition of said feeder circuit exists; and a group phasing device for all of said circuit breakers comprising an element effective, when operated, to establish said predetermined abnormal condition of said feeder circuit, a negative phase sequence voltage filter for segregating a negative sequence component of voltage of said feeder circuit, means responsive to the negative sequence voltage segregated by said filter for operating said element, and means responsive to an excess'voltage condition between a secondary phase conductor of one of said transformer means and a corresponding phase'conductor of said network circuit for operating said element.

6. In an alternating-current network system of distribution, a three-phase four-conductor alternating-current network circuit; a three-phase alternating-current feeder circuit; a plurality of transformer means forsupplying power from i said feeder circuit to said network circuit; a plurality of network circuit breakers for controlling the power fiow through said transformer means, each of said circuit breakers having individual closing means therefor; means individual to said circuit breakers for preventing closure of the corresponding circuit breaker when a predetermined abnormal condition of said feeder circuit exists; and a groupphasing device for all of said circuit breakers comprising an element eifective, when operated, to establish saidspredetermined abnormal condition of said feeder circuit, a negative phase sequence voltage filter for segregating a negative sequence component of voltage of said feeder circuit, means responsive to the negative sequence voltage ated by said filter for operating said element, and means responsive to an excess voltage condition between a secondary phase conductor of one of said transformer means and a corresponding phase conductor of said network circuit for operating said element,

said excess voltage condition being of the order of 140% of the normal line-to-ncutral voltage of said network circuit.

JOHN s. (masons. GEORGE o. nsmusou. 

